Balblair 1999-2016, 2nd Ed.


Once upon a time the most confusing whisky on the market was official Glenrothes. Their vintage releases had labels that noted the year of distillation and also the date on which the whisky was said to have been not bottled but “checked”. I don’t know if anyone quite understood what that meant. Then arrived Kilkerran’s Work in Progress series, with the different releases marked not by a clear year of release or number but by differences in label colour, some of which were very subtle indeed. Glenrothes has now gotten into the regular age stated game but Balblair is carrying the torch for confusing vintage releases. In their case both distillation and bottling years are clearly marked but there are multiple releases of editions marked by the same distillation year. Thus the 1999 Second Edition has come out in 2014, 2015, 2016, while the 1999 First Edition has come out in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and now 2018 (some of those seemingly as Travel Retail exclusives). In case you’re wondering if the two editions can be distinguished by cask type, they all seem to be from a mix of sherry and bourbon casks. And nor is it clear what it means for the same edition to be released in different years. This is the kind of thing that drives people to drink. And so I might as well pour this sample. 

Balblair 1999-2016, 2nd Edition. (46%; from a sample from a friend)

Nose: Lovely fresh nose with fruit (lemon peel, apple, pear), cereals and malty sweetness all intermingled. A little bready on the second sniff. Stays pretty steady with time and air. Maltier with a few drops of water and the fruit is muskier (the pear is cooked); a bit of vanilla too now.

Palate: Pretty much as promised by the nose but with a bracing bitterness to frame the rest. Nice thick texture at full strength. Not a lot of change worth noting with time—the lemon peel expands a bit but that’s about all I’m tracking. Let’s see what water does. Maltier here too with water and sweeter.

Finish: Medium-long. That bitter note turns zesty and tingling as it goes. As on the palate with water.

Comments: This is classic Balblair in that Northern Highlands vein—malt, stone fruit, citrus. I know this is said to have ex-sherry casks in the mix but it tastes completely driven by ex-bourbon casks. No fireworks but very, very good. I wonder what the other editions are like. I liked it better with water.

Rating: 86 points.

Thanks to Michael K. for the sample! Read his review here.

4 thoughts on “Balblair 1999-2016, 2nd Ed.

  1. I don’t know what these editions means but I have no problem with Balblair as they tell you exactly how old the whisky is. This “checked” business by Glenrothes on the other hand…

    I haven’t had this, but I’ve had its replacement in the core range, the 2000/2017. Comparing it to your notes, it has a lot more sherry influence, and indeed I read it was practically double matured as opposed to just finished (13 years in bourbon casks and the rest in sherry).

    Like

  2. Although, on a related (and at the same time unrelated, as I did it before your post appeared) note, I actually emailed Balblair yesterday for an explanation of what their release numbers mean. This is because of a recently purchased Balblair 2005 1st release. This was bottled at 2018, so I was surprised it was the same release number as a 2016 bottling I got two years ago.

    Not sure where that ranks among the geekiest emails Balblair have received, but I’ll let you know if they get back to me with an explanation.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.