Glen Garioch 22, 1990 (Kintra Whisky)

Glen Garioch 22, 1990
I have previously reviewed two Glen Gariochs from 1990. I quite liked this 21 yo from Archives, but was less enamored of this 20 yo, which was from the Dutch bottler, Kintra Whisky, as is the one I am reviewing today. Those were both from bourbon casks, whereas this one is from refill sherry and a hogshead at that. Indeed, it may be the only sherry cask among the few Glen Gariochs I’ve tried. Let’s get right to it.

Glen Garioch 22, 1990 (51.2%. refill sherry hogshead #7934; from a purchased sample)

Nose: Sherried indeed with raisins and orange peel but also a lot of pine resin and some rawer oak along with a lot of woody spice (clove, cinnamon). The raw wood subsides quickly and there’s more salt now. With even more time the pine subsides as well and now it’s more conventionally sherried with toffee and light salted caramel. With water there’s some apricot jam and lemon peel.

Palate: As on the nose, the wood is to the fore but there’s no pine here: instead there’s a fair bit of raw wood (pencil shavings), just this side of being too tannic. Dried orange peel as well and the spices from the nose. More salt on the second and third sips but I’m not getting the sweeter notes from the nose–the clove seems to intensify. Water pushes back the wood and brings out some citrus; the tannic wood turns into a more pleasurable peppery counterpoint.

Finish: Long. It’s the wood that makes the strongest impression, but it gets far less raw past the swallow. Some bitter caramel too. At the very end there’s a slight taste of blood in the mouth as sometimes happens with not fully integrated sherry (and no, my gums aren’t bleeding–I checked). Less wood and more citrus on the finish too with water.

Comments: An oddball for sure, with conventional sherry character thrown for a curve by the wood influence, which seems more extreme than I would expect from a refill cask. In fact, neat, that pencil shaving note on the palate puts me in mind of my terrible bottle of the Balcones Brimstone, though it’s not as out there as that. I liked it better with water. On the whole, more interesting than their 20 yo, 1990 cask, but I’m not sure I like it enough to justify a much higher score.

Rating: 85 points.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s