Glenrothes 25, 1988 (Archives)

Glenrothes 25, 1988 (Archives)This is the oldest Glenrothes I’ve yet tried. Unlike the distillery’s vintage releases, which are typically vattings of ex-bourbon and ex-sherry spirit, this release in the “Fishes of Samoa” series from Archives (the imprint of the Whiskybase shop in Rotterdam) is from a single refill sherry hogshead (presumably rebuilt from a broken down butt). Let’s get right to it.

Glenrothes 25, 1988 (53%; refill sherry hogshead #7318; from a purchased sample)

Nose: Bright and fresh–fresh squeezed oranges as I pour but by the time I lift the glass to my nose there’s more lemon than orange. A spirity edge at first but it goes away as the lemon begins to get both muskier and sweeter. Lots of malt as well under the fruit which now includes a bit of pineapple and a bit of grapefruity bitterness. Later it settles down to lime and a simple syrupy sweetness. Water brings out a fair bit of vanilla and also a more floral sweetness.

Palate: Starts out with citrus (more zesty here), malty sweetness and a faintly metallic edge. A bit of vanilla too. Everything is very nicely integrated. Lovely, thick mouthfeel. More bitterness on the second sip (zesty rather than metallic) and more lime. Nice, but simple. Let’s see what water does. Well, it brings out the pepper much earlier.

Finish: Long. Malty and zesty and slightly peppery. More peppery with water. And with more time there’s a slight metallic edge.

Comments: As far away from the official profile as you could imagine without heavy peat being involved. And not much sherry here really–it tastes very much like it’s ex-bourbon with the brighter flavours and aromas dominant. I’d speculate that this was from a very tired butt broken down into hogsheads so as to increase wood to spirit ratio in one last filling. It doesn’t taste particularly old, and there’s not much development to speak of, but at the very reasonable price it’s hard to complain (this is still available).

Rating: 85 points.

3 thoughts on “Glenrothes 25, 1988 (Archives)

  1. I had pretty similar thoughts and impressions, really. Although, perhaps showing (half of) my roots, where you saw metallic, I saw gum leaf!
    A rather atypical Glenrothes, I thought, but in a good way.

    Like

  2. Gum leaf–cool. I know some people get annoyed when they see taste/aroma referents they can’t relate to, but I have to say I enjoy reading them.

    Like

  3. I thought Serge had reviewed this today and got the details wrong: his review is of cask 7318 as well but he has the strength at 53.4% and the bottling year as 2012. Then I wondered if I’d gotten it wrong and double-checked Whiskybase: it appears that Whiskybase bottled part of this cask in 2012 and then the rest in 2013. I wish I’d realized this back then—it would have been a rare opportunity to track changes in the same whisky in the same cask with another two years of aging!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.