Hampden 18, 1998 (Kill Devil)


I have been slow to board the rum boat. I’ve only reviewed three rums till now. In the meantime, Serge V.—who all but singlehandedly got whisky geeks around the world to start drinking rum—has already reviewed more rums than I have whiskies in the entire time that I’ve been reviewing whiskies. This is not an exaggeration.

One of the problems with being late to the party is that most of what first got people excited is already gone and prices have begun to rise. Still, they’ve got a long way to go to catch up with whisky. Hampden is a cult distillery, for instance, and this 18 yo, released last year, is still around and costs far less than the Highland Park 18. Of course, the bigger problem for those of us in the US is how little interesting rum is available here. K&L in California were the only ones committed to a rum program but the new limitations on inter-state shipping may have put paid to that: large numbers of bottles of a Hampden they brought in early in the year and expected to sell out in a day or two are still sitting on their shelves (well, it’s possible that asking $70 for a 9 yo rum may also have something to do with that). Anyway, there’s an opportunity here for independent bottlers who already have distribution channels across the US: if you make good rum available to us widely, we will buy it. 

Hampden 18, 1998 (46%; Kill Devil; from my own bottle)

Nose: Over the top aromatic like all the (few) Hampdens I’ve had: bananas, bananas, bananas. And banana bread. And a rotting trash heap in the sun. Plus pineapple and an almost berry-like sweetness. Under and through it all: machine oil, diesel, recently oiled hinges, black olive tapenade. With a lot of time and air the bananas back off a bit and there’s more balance (if that’s the right word for a nose like this one). Water mellows the fruit further and pulls out more of the diesel. I’ve sat in buses that smelled like this and not enjoyed it but this I enjoy.

Palate: Yes, it’s all that stuff from the nose, except leading with the funk before the fruit comes through and with a lashing of peppery smoke. Perfect texture and bite at 46%. More diesel here too with water and also some bready notes.

Finish: Long. Nothing new: all that stuff slowly fades out with the banana bread (with a bit of diesel in the batter) coming out again at the end. Longer with water and yes, more diesel here as well.

Comments: This is crazy stuff. Completely in line with that insanely high proof Habitation Velier release but mellower and far more drinkable (and I liked it far better than K&L’s 24 yo as well). So much so, in fact, that after a couple of pours from this bottle I immediately bought a few more bottles. I recommend you give it a go too if you can.

Rating: 90 points.

10 thoughts on “Hampden 18, 1998 (Kill Devil)

  1. Hi MAO. Question unrelated to today’s piece: Does scotch change much (for better or worse) after bottling? I know there’s no more exchange with the barrel wood, but the chemicals in the scotch probably break down into simpler chemicals over time (even if cellar stored), so at least subtle changes seem likely. Just wondering your opinion. Thanks. -Mark

    Mark Masselink

    >

    Like

    • There won’t be any noticeable change in a properly stored (i.e away from sunlight/uv light and heat sources; stored upright) closed bottle—at least not for a very, very long time (many, many decades). However, once a bottle is opened it will change with time depending on how tight the cork is, how much air is in contact with the whisky (which will depend largely on how empty/full the bottle is).

      By the way, I removed the email address and cellphone number from your comment.

      Like

      • Well, 90 points is a very high score for me. I very rarely go higher. In my “system” to go higher than 90 points a whisky/whatever needs greater depth, complexity and development than this has. Those things are not necessarily correlated with higher proofs.

        Like

  2. I’ll have to look for this one. Which cask is this? The label may not have the cask # but it should state the date it was distilled and the number of bottles. I can’t quite make it out in the image. Thanks!

    Like

  3. This is a beautiful rum, with a lot going on. Much of it is not in your face – even the diesel that you may have mentioned in your review. The aromas in the almost-empty glass are terribly similar to what I found in St. George absinthe verte: anise, herbs, eau-de-vie (peach, apricot). It also reminds me of a marc, perhaps the gentle wood talking. It’s still not a 90p whisky for me, but very good indeed! I liked the bus experience image, I know what you’re talking about! (Diesel and various other organic smells emerging with close proximity to one’s ilk.) Thanks for the sample!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.