Glen Ord 17, 1997 (Signatory for K&L)

glenord17-1997
I’ve noted a number of times that I was less than impressed with what I tasted of K&L’s selections for 2013 (most of which showed up in early 2014 for reasons outside their control). Despite having resolved to “try before buying” as far as possible for their future selections I was predictably unable to resist getting some of their 2014 selections when they showed up early this year. I’ve already reviewed one of these, the Hepburn’s Choice Craigellachie 18, which I quite liked. The other two that I purchased are both cask strength bottles from Signatory (though in the livery of the regular UCF series rather than the decanters—a change I welcome heartily). One is a Glenburgie 19 that I hope to review soon; the other is this Glen Ord 17. Both of these are distilleries whose malts I enjoy more often than not, and both of these are also distilleries whose malts are not often available in the US—which is my way of justifying my lack of self-control. Anyway, let’s see what this is like.

Glen Ord 17, 1997 (58.3%; Signatory for K&L; bourbon hogshead 800089; from my own bottle)

Nose: Toasted oak, honey, malt. With a bit of air a mellow fruitiness develops: apricot, a touch of lemon peel. With a lot more time the lemon peel gets more zesty and is the top note. With a lot more time (as in “got distracted for almost 40 minutes”) it gets maltier too. With a couple of drops of water it gets muskier first and then creamier and a bit floral. Another minute and there’s some ripe white peach and then the lemon turns into citronella.

Palate: Very much as on the nose on arrival but then the fruit gets more intense. The oak expands too: spicier and more peppery now; and more bitter lemon peel/zest too (and a touch of ginger too). Nice oily mouthfeel. It’s expressive neat but does taste a bit hot and so: water. Sweeter now and the lemon and oak are more integrated.

Finish: Long. Nothing new: the lemon peel and oak ease out together. Not much change here with water.

Comments: This is a lot more wood-forward than I normally like but it comes together nicely with water (which I strongly recommend adding). Neat, it’s more straightforwardly pleasurable (without much development or complexity) but with water it opens up nicely on the nose and becomes more balanced on the palate. I’m tempted to get another.

Rating: 86 points.

2 thoughts on “Glen Ord 17, 1997 (Signatory for K&L)

  1. I just don’t know what to do with this one. I purchased this one almost half a year ago, but it’s still not even half way empty.

    I want to like it. I really do. It’s got such a strange, almost cherry-sour-tape thing going on that I have to commend it for that.

    But I can’t shake the “Drakkar Noir” thing. For me, it shows up on the nose and the palate, and I’m left with memories of being beat up by the lockers by C building in between 3rd and 4th periods in junior high. It’s so unmistakable to me. Just this aqua/floral note that I’ve never found in any other malt.

    This one’s a special one, but I still don’t know if I can hang with just how “special” it is.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s