Balmenach 26, 1988 (Signatory for Binny’s)

Balmenach 26, 1988, Signatory for Binny's
Here is the last of the recent’ish Binny’s exclusives that I split with a bunch of other whisky geeks. I’ve previously reviewed a Glenlivet 19, a Laphroaig 17, a Linkwood 16, and a Clynelish 7 (all from Signatory); an Ardmore 16 and a Ledaig 13 (both from G&M); and a OB Glen Garioch 16. This Signatory Balmenach is the oldest of the lot (I mention this in case you are really bad at counting); it is, however, a year younger than mentioned on Binny’s website—there it is listed as a 27 yo but, in fact, it is a 26 yo (the correct age is on the label along with the distilling and bottling dates). I”d been planning to review this one a while ago, and I’m not really sure why I never got around to it. As a result, however, I am reviewing this after the bottle has been near the halfway mark for a bit over two months (nearly half the bottle went into the splits as soon as I received it). And so this review is not going to be representative of a freshly opened bottle. 

There have been a lot of Balmenachs from 1988 released recently, many of them by Signatory. This, I am pretty sure, is nothing more than the usual run of chance by which an indie bottler comes into a big stash of casks from a particular year; I am also pretty sure that if it hasn’t already this will lead to the usual run of bogus theories about magical years of distillation. Well, I’ve previously reviewed another of these 1988s, a 25 yo also bottled by Signatory for Binny’s, and if this is as good I’ll be happy.

Balmenach 26, 1988, Signatory for Binny'sBalmenach 26, 1988 (51.6%; Signatory for Binny’s; hogshead #2805; from a bottle split)

Nose: Spicy oak (hints of anise and rye), some banana; sweeter fruit below all that but it’s a bit indistinct and closed. Gets a bit dusty as it sits. The sweetness takes a turn towards what I can only describe as vanilla cupcake frosting with sprinkles. Far less woody with water and the spicy notes and the sweeter fruit are joined by the lime peel from the palate.

Palate: Starts out sweeter but there’s a fair bit of wood here too. Hotter than you might expect at 51.6%. On the second sip there’s some lemon below the sweet and woody notes. Not much else though. This might need water to fully express itself—but let’s give it a bit more time first. Well, as it sits that citrus note turns to bitter lime zest and the wood recedes but there’s still a vaguely grainy, slightly astringent note. Hmmm I was expecting water to bring out more fruit but it doesn’t; it does bring out some pepper and more oak extract.

Finish: Medium. No improvement or development here I’m afraid. The finish does get longer with time. No change to speak of with water.

Comments: Well, I’m sorry I didn’t taste this right after I opened the bottle as I am now unable to tell you if my experience tonight is an artifact of this bottle having sat at the half-full mark for two months or if this is just what this cask is like. At any rate, though it did come on with time, in its current state it’s nowhere near the league of Binny’s previous Signatory Balmenach and I don’t think I could recommend it at even a much lower price than is being asked for it now. I will keep at the rest of the bottle though and will report back if it changes/improves. In the meantime, I’d love to hear from others who’ve tasted this one. Am I out here by myself on this one?

Rating: 80 points.

3 thoughts on “Balmenach 26, 1988 (Signatory for Binny’s)

  1. Well, my nose and palate seem to be operating normally today and so I decided to revisit a bit of this Balmenach in light of Michael’s review. With his notes very much in mind, I’m getting more barley on the nose and I could very easily be talked into that faint medicinal note too. On the palate, however, I’m not getting all the fruit he got and the astringent/grainy note I remarked is still here, and maybe even a bit more plasticky now.

    Keeping mind that there are a lot of crossovers in our notes, how to account for the big differences? It’s one thing to have different scores but another to register such different levels/types of fruit. Well, his sample was poured right when the bottle got near the halfway mark, whereas I took my notes after the bottle had sat at that level much longer. It’s possible that exposure to air in the bottle made this fall apart a bit. If you have a bottle and find your experience closer to Michael’s when you first open it maybe the lesson is to not take too long to drink it down.

    I am interested to hear what others who’ve tasted this make of it—please write in if you have.

    Like

  2. Pingback: Balmenach 26 (Signatory Vintage Binny’s Selection 1988/2015 Cask #2805) Review – Whisky Musings

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s