Ben Nevis 19, 1996 (Cadenhead)


After a few very untimely reviews let’s do a couple this week that were bottled closer to the present—just last year, in fact (they’re not available any more either but you can’t have everything). First up, this Ben Nevis 19, 1996 bottled by the usually very reliable Cadenhead in their Small Batch series. I bought this at auction in the UK and the bottle did not come with the dangling paper thingy that contains all the cask details on these releases (is there a name for those things?). The label does say “Small Batch” but Whiskybase tells me there were only 222 bottles released. So, was it actually a single cask? Hard to see how you could blend two or more casks and arrive at so few bottles—unless only a part of the vatting was released here. Anyway, I bought it because ex-bourbon Ben Nevis can offer the tropical fruit that I so love in single malt whisky at a younger age than most distilleries, and because the last Cadenhead’s Small Batch ex-bourbon Ben Nevis from 1996 that I bought was just excellent (as was the last ex-sherry Ben Nevis from 1996 that I bought). I am happy to say that my hopes were not dashed on the shoals of reality. 

Ben Nevis 19, 1996 (51.1%; Cadenhead’s Small Batch; bourbon hogshead; from my own bottle)

Nose: Typical bourbon cask Ben Nevis with peppery, musky fruit (melon, pineapple, kaffir lime) and a hard candy, citrussy sweetness. Beneath it is some biscuity malt. A drop of water makes it quite a bit sharper to start but also pulls out some cream.

Palate: Comes on with white pepper and lime and then the muskier fruit expands as I swallow (think a fruity New Zealand Sauvignon Blanc). Nice, oily mouthfeel. As on the nose, it gets maltier as it goes and with more time the prickliness is as minerally as it’s peppery; more pineapple too. Water doesn’t do anything interesting for it here and washes out most of the fruit.

Finish: Long. Pepper, lime, oak and a bit of milk chocolate at the very end. With more time the citrus is closer to orange than lime. More indistinct here too with water.

Comments: This is really very good, fruity bourbon cask whisky with a nice mix of pepper, malt and brighter tropical fruit. At 51.1% it seems to be at its perfect drinking strength: I’d hold the water. I’ve been drinking it down steadily since I opened it and it’s at its best once it’s gotten a bit of air in the bottle.

Rating: 88 points.

3 thoughts on “Ben Nevis 19, 1996 (Cadenhead)

  1. Sounds great, and thanks for the “timely” review…you’re getting there.

    As an aside, I’m fairly certain the way to differentiate in this series between a vatting of casks and single cask release is that the vattings have black labels and the single casks have gold labels. Hope this helps.

    Like

  2. The only possibility I can think of is that Cadenhead have bought vatted stock: an unspecified number of casks dumped and vatted together by Ben Nevis, returned to casks, and then sold to different customers. Cadenhead may have bought one of those casks, which only contained 222 bottles.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s