Indian Accent (Delhi, January 2014)

Indian Accent Interior

Indian Accent, which opened in the boutique Manor hotel in Friends Colony three or four years ago, may or may not be Delhi’s most talked about fine dining restaurant but it is surely on the very short list of the most ambitious. Its reputation among Delhi foodies–at least among the subset in my group of friends–rests on Chef Manish Mehrotra’s nouveau/fusion take on traditional Indian food. A few things about my feelings about all this before I get to the meal itself:

1) I’m generally suspicious of all kinds of Asian fusion in the US because it seems to me that restaurants that try it are predicated on two things usually: a clientele that doesn’t actually eat/know Asian cuisines in their original contexts; and a bogus narrative in which Asian cuisines are seen as being “modernized” or elevated through whatever is being done to/with them. At best in the high end the use of Asian ingredients/flavours/techniques is seen as proof of the Euro/American trained chef’s openness of mind or creativity while they remain firmly grounded in the Euro/American idiom which remains the guarantor of their credentials.

2) Fusion cooking in India, however, has a different kind of charge. I’m not talking here about the unfussy, relaxed manner in which much of fusion in Indian restaurant/home cooking happens (paneer pizzas or pizza dhoklas anyone?) but of the fact that no one at the high end can reasonably make the claim that it is in their approach that Indian food achieves its apotheosis. And as chefs are far more likely to be grounded in their “home” cuisines, experiments, theoretically, at least, have a better chance of being organic. Thus when Mehrotra was asked recently in the Times of India if he is tempted by molecular gastronomy his response indicated very clearly where his cooking is anchored:

“Mine is the most difficult clientele — they know Indian food.

Also, for Indians, two things are very important — we like our food served hot. Molecular gastronomy, which cools down elements, doesn’t work well with this. Secondly, no matter how fancy our meals get, we need our daal-roti — without this, our stomachs may be filled but the soul doesn’t feel sated!”

It was reading this interview that made me want to eat at Indian Accent, overcoming my knee-jerk suspicion of kababs made with foie gras.

3) Nonetheless, it’s always a little hard to parse whether restaurants that do this kind of thing in Delhi get talked up because they’re actually good at it or because they present an exciting alternative in a food scene filled with more familiar fare. It’s also hard to parse whether the fact that Indian Accent uses the platings and language of current haute European/American cuisine makes it more appealing to the similarly globe-trotting westernized elite, allowing them/us to signal our difference from those eating traditional Indian fare (at your Bukharas or Dum Pukhts) and their/our currency with contemporary western trends.

All this to say that a restaurant like Indian Accent is caught in a complex cultural web, and to foreground both that I have a complicated set of biases going into meals like this and that I was expecting this meal to be very enjoyable anyway.

It’s a very nice space, as you would expect in a tony hotel in tony Friends Colony, and the clientele seems a mix of wealthy European and American tourists and locals (perhaps tilted a bit towards the former group). They do two seatings for dinner–at 7 pm and 9.30 pm, and if you’re willing to dine at 7 you’ll have no trouble securing a table as few Delhi’ites believe in eating dinner before 9.30.

So, how did it turn out? Let’s take a look at what we ate first. There were three of us and we all got the tasting menu–it seemed the best way to sample a number of their specialties on a trip that would not allow a second visit. The tasting menu here–at least on this occasion–consists of a series of small bites and then a large entree portion. As always, click on the thumbnails to launch a larger slideshow with captions.

All in all, a very nice meal and it blew completely out of the water any comparable meal I’ve had in the US (at Indique in DC and Devi in NYC in their primes). Still, not all parts of it worked. As I’ve suggested in my brief notes some of these dishes worked better as ideas than as actual dishes and often seemed more obvious than creative (the cornetto is the chief culprit here); and it does seem as though the regular menu has far more of this kind of thing on it (tacos with phulkas or chicken tikka quesadillas, for example). In other cases, the non-Indian plating style kept dishes from being properly enjoyed: no one is going to be able to eat all of the sauces with the mains with a spoon, for example, so either don’t give as much or give us some rice or appams or proper rotis or something to eat them with. The stuffed kulchas served at this point were particularly pointless.

Nonetheless, it is a sign of Chef Mehrotra’s training and vision that the things that worked best included both the most traditional dishes (the chaat was great and the dal was awesome) and some of the more nouveau interpretations (the doda burfi tart, the pomegranate churan sorbet). In sum, I did not end the meal wishing that Chef Mehrotra had just made us a traditional meal (though I could see clearly how great that would be too).

In other areas, however, Indian Accent is still lagging far behind its ambitions. The staff, while very pleasant and genial, just don’t understand the food well enough to describe it. The most egregious of the errors was one server explaining to a number of tables that the daulat ki chaat was made with tartar sauce! And I was shocked when the Darjeeling tea I ordered turned out to be a Twining teabag on arrival. And on the bill it was described (and charged) as a seasonal tea. Apparently, they do usually serve real tea and were out that night but maybe they could have told us that?

On the whole, I recommend it highly. It must be said that it is not cheap, if not out of line with other restaurants in fancy hotels: it came to about $200 for three people without wine (there is a wine-pairing as well for the tasting menu but we passed on it). We will be back on our next trip to Delhi and on that occasion I think we’ll pass on whatever the iteration of the tasting menu will be then and get some of the other interesting stuff off the carte.

2 thoughts on “Indian Accent (Delhi, January 2014)

  1. I really enjoy the way you package insider information to a (supposedly mostly) Western audience. I would never have imagined so much meat on the menu of the fancier Indian restaurants (assuming you didn’t solely visit restaurants with Muslim roots). I never got close to that type of places while traveling with a ragtag backpack on a $20 per day budget many moons ago (please take heed: never as a lost soul and always appropriately dressed). The few times I went to middle-end restaurants the fare was always 100% vegetarian, as it was down at the bottom. I did see meat and fish in stalls and stores along the Malabar coast, but it was pretty much local (I skipped Goa). I must say I didn’t seek out animal protein, as I was intend on staying bug-free, so I may have overlooked a lot. Interestingly, this post about fusion cuisine contains more vegetarian dishes than those about traditional cuisine.

    I share your reservation/ suspicion/ disdain (choose the one that fits best) with regards to fusion cooking, but am also aware that fusion can lead to delightful innovation and once rooted becomes ‘traditional’ – cf. potatoes, tomatoes and chillies in Indian cuisine and pastas in Italy. Too bad that the potato wiped out the cereal-based cuisine of NW Europe, though – some of the worst results of this transformation can be experienced in McDonalds and Burger King.

    Like

  2. Thanks for reading along. I imagine the larger part of my whisky readership is largely uninterested in my food posts (confirmed by relative pageview counts)–I joked on Twitter yesterday that with every food review I seem to lose two followers.

    Indian food habits are actually quite surprising given the stereotype of predominant Hindu vegetarianism. I don’t have the time to look for the link now, but an in-depth study a few years ago confirmed that the majority of the country are in fact meat eaters (and this cuts across regions); and that even the prevalence of beef is much higher than expected (though it is not always clear if cow and water buffalo are being distinguished).

    Of course, I am also a dedicated carnivore which explains why you see so little veg. in many of my meal reports. Right now, however, I am on a largely vegetarian diet as I try to work off the excesses of 3.5 weeks of over-eating.

    And yes, most of the world’s food is fusion in a broader sense (imagine Indian, Thai or Sichuan food without chillies), but that kind of slow moving cultural hybridity is usually organic or at least it becomes so over time. A lot of the fusion in the US of the type I am suspicious of is a self-conscious hodge-podge–closer to a whisky finished very briefly in a red wine cask than to a true long-term double matured malt. Sorry for mixing my metaphors here.

    Finally, I am conscious of the fact that the majority of my blog’s readership is not Indian but I am hesitant to “translate” and explain overmuch–plus I want to review the meals, not act as a cultural guide. So, I’d rather give a sense of context and leave it to readers who need a little more gloss to do a little more work to find out information or to ask. After all, I do have some Indian readers (and some knowledgeable non-Indians as well) who would find all that overbearing and I don’t want to privilege one set over the other.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.