A true classic, the Lagavulin 16 was the first bottle of whisky I spent more than $50 on. And after my first sip I was so utterly disappointed I’d thrown my money away on a whisky that smelled and tasted as nasty as it did: a rotting, mossy tree trunk with a nasty tonic from my childhood thrown on it—that’s what I remember thinking after my first sip and sniff. How I’ve changed in a decade. Whether Lagavulin 16 has or not is a more controversial matter. There are those who insist it has and not for the good—it’s always hard for me to extricate this sort of a judgement from a more general expression of belief in whisky entropy (“everything changes for the worse”); on the other hand, there are those who say it has maintained its quality and general profile over time. I am in the latter camp but I grant that I have not tasted a Lagavulin 16 bottled since 2008 or so. Well, this bottle—which belonged to a good friend who left the country and also left some bottles for a couple of us to split—is from 2012.
This bottle’s been open for at least a year and when I poured my share it was down to the last third or so.
Lagavulin 16 (43%; bottled in 2012; from a bottle split)
Nose: Meaty smoke, pencil lead and disinfectant. Some ink too and a bit of charred wood. Gets brinier as it sits and also a little lemony with some oyster liquor thrown in as well. And there’s a touch of that peat moss that freaked me out on my first ever taste, way back when. With more time there’s some polished leather. A drop of water intensifies the lemon-oyster combo and adds some olive brine to it.
Palate: The smoke is much ashier on the palate and more intense—behind it there’s the inky note and then the brine. On the second sip there’s some of the lemon and the smoke is more tarry. The mouthfeel is a bit thin. Gets saltier with each sip and the citrus moves closer to orange. With more time the smoke begins to turn a little acidic. Water cuts the acidity and makes it sweeter; thins it out even more, alas.
Finish: Long; much longer than you would expect from a whisky at 43%. The smoke goes on for a long time getting woodier and more bitter as it goes. The sweetness continues into the finish with water with wet stones and soot.
Comments: Not as dense and dark as it used to be but still very good. The nose, in particular, is great; it’s just a little too thin on the palate—that may well be because this is from the end of the bottle but it’s the part I’m drinking. And call me crazy, but I can see a clear through-line from this to the glorious 21 yo. If this is decline may I also decline this well.
Rating: 88 points.